Amendment: Removal of a separate "Evaluator" role

1 post / 0 new
Madius
Madius's picture.
MediatorNewbie HelperSetting Department MemberSystem Department MemberStoryhostSite Lead
Last online
4 months 4 days ago
Amendment: Removal of a separate "Evaluator" role
Type: 
Amendment to site governance

This amendment would merge the current "Evaluator" role, which has SH as a pre-requisite, into the normal duties of all SHs.


Q1
Do you agree with merging the "evaluator" role, which has SH as a prerequisite, into the normal SH duties for all SHs? This would amend our site governance only to remove references to a separate role - the nature of evaluator duties, the oversight and the training involved would all remain exactly as they are now.

This webform is no longer accepting submissions.


Proposal help:
Proposals are meant to be a way to formally make a request for the input of site members. Forum threads and five-star ratings are not accurate enough for the big things. So here's how this works:
  • If you change your mind after you vote, you will be able to go back in and delete or change your vote up until the proposal closes.
  • The form will be open for 2 weeks, after which it will automatically close.
  • If the original poster edits it in that timespan the timer will re-set. This is to make sure everyone can get a chance to weigh in.
  • Only users active when the proposal was created can vote on it. This is to avoid ballot stuffing.
  • No one, not even the original poster will be able to see the names or IP addresses of the people do vote.
  • After the two week window has passed, the proposal will close and results will be publicly availble in a tab on this page.
7 out of 47 potential voters (15 %) responsed to this proposal. 7 out of 23 potential voters active on the site while the proposal was open (30 %) responded to this proposal.
Based on the percentage of active voter responses: NOT enough voters have participated for the results of this proposal to be accepted.

Summary of responses reflects how many users selected a given value in the poll. In general, the larger the number the stronger the overall preference for that result. Text responses are briefly summarized but should be read individually.

Summary of responses

 
Q1
Yes, I agree - amend our site governance to remove the separate evaluator role7
Additional Comments
Left Blank6
User entered value1
Average submission length in words (ex blanks)23.00
Showing all results. 7 results total.

Detailed responses

Q1Additional Comments
Yes, I agree - amend our site governance to remove the separate evaluator role
Yes, I agree - amend our site governance to remove the separate evaluator role
Yes, I agree - amend our site governance to remove the separate evaluator role
Yes, I agree - amend our site governance to remove the separate evaluator roleMakes sense on the tech side and for how we're handling our SH training now. There's really no need for the extra role.
Yes, I agree - amend our site governance to remove the separate evaluator role
Yes, I agree - amend our site governance to remove the separate evaluator role
Yes, I agree - amend our site governance to remove the separate evaluator role